The Boys and I: A Child's Story for Children — A Reader’s Guide

(0 User reviews)   150
Molesworth, Mrs., 1839-1921, Baumer, Lewis Christopher Edward, 1870-1963 [Illustrator] Project Gutenberg 2010 Not confirmed
Siblings -- Juvenile fiction; London (England) -- Juvenile fiction; Uncles -- Juvenile fiction; Children -- Juvenile fiction Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 56,313
Reading time 245 min
Text sections 7

The Boys and I: A Child's Story for Children — A Reader’s Guide can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 56,313 words, 4 hr 5 min estimated reading time, and 7 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 17.3 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Siblings -- Juvenile fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Mrs. Molesworth's 1882 children's novel, narrated by nine-year-old Audrey, recounts the adventures and misadventures of three siblings sent to live with their uncle in London after their father is posted to China. The story is told in Audrey's colloquial, self-correcting voice, blending childish earnestness with a retrospective awareness of her own growth.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.7/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

"O, it is trouble very bad, Which causes us to weep; All last night long we were so sad, Not one of us could sleep."

Sometimes they called us all three just "the boys." But I don't think that was fair. I may have been rather a _tom_boy, but I wasn't quite so bad as to be called a "boy." I was nine then-- I mean I was nine at the beginning of the time I am going to tell you about, and now I am fourteen. Afterwards, I will tell you what put it into my head to write it down. If I told you now you wouldn't understand--at least not without my telling you things all out of their places--ends at the beginning, and middles at the end; and mother says it's an awfully bad habit to do things that way. It makes her quite vexed to see any one read the end of a book before they have really got to it. There aren't many things that make her really vexed, but that's one, and another is saying "awfully," and I've just said it, or at least written it. And I can't score it through--I've promised not to score through anything, and just to leave it as it came into my head to write it all down.

I was nine that year, and Tom was seven, and little Racey six. I remember it quite well, for that year a lot of things happened. Tom and I had the measles, and how it was Racey didn't have them too I don't know, but he didn't. And just when we were getting better, the first very big thing that we had ever known about, happened. Papa was ordered to go to China! (I dare say it seems funny to you that we call him "papa" and mother "mother." I can't tell you how it was, but we always did it, and Tom and I used to like to hear Racey say "papa." He said it in such a sweet way, more like the way little French children say it.)

Papa wasn't a soldier, or a sailor, as you might think. He was something very clever, with letters after his name, and he had to go to China partly because of that. Now that I am big I understand about it, but I need not say exactly, because then you might find out who he was, and that wouldn't be nice. It would be like as if I thought we were cleverer or nicer than other people, and I don't think that--at least not in a stuck-up way, and _of course_, not at all about myself. It isn't any harm to think it a little about one's father or mother, I don't think, but of course not about one's-self.

I shall never forget the day I heard about papa's going away. I keep saying "papa's going away," because you see it had to do with him, but it was even worse than his going, though that would have been bad enough. It was just as we were getting better of the measles, and we had been very happy all day, for mother had been telling us stories, and we had had quite a "feast" tea--sponge-cakes and ladies' bread and butter; and I had poured out the tea, for mother had put a little table on purpose close to my bed, and Racey had been the footman to wait upon Tom and give him all he wanted, as the table wasn't so near his bed as mine. Tom had fallen asleep--poor Tom, he had had the measles worse than I. I am so awfully strong, even though I'm only a girl, and boys always think themselves stronger. And little Racey had fallen asleep too, lying at the foot of my bed. He hadn't been kept away from us because of what Tom called the "affection" of the measles, for the old doctor said he had better get it too and have it over. But he didn't get it, and if ever I have children I shall not do that way with them. I'll try and keep them from having any illnesses at all, for I don't believe we're _forced_ to have them. I think mother thought so too, but she didn't like to contradict the doctor; because he was so old she thought he must know best. And after all it didn't matter, as Racey didn't get the measles. I really must try to go straight on-- I keep going back when other things come into my head, so it isn't so easy to write things down nicely as I thought it was.

From its first sentence, The Boys and I announces itself as a story told in a child's voice, not an adult's recollection of childhood. The narrator, nine-year-old Audrey, immediately pushes back against being lumped with her brothers: 'I may have been rather a tom boy, but I wasn't quite so bad as to be called a "boy."' This small protest establishes her as a character who cares about fairness and precision, even as she admits to breaking her own rules—she uses 'awfully' after promising not to, then leaves it uncrossed because she's 'promised not to score through anything.' The effect is a narrative that feels spoken rather than written, full of the tangles and self-corrections of a real child trying to get a story down.

Audrey's Unreliable but Earnest Narration

Audrey tells her story from the vantage of fourteen, looking back at her nine-year-old self, but she does not pretend to have adult omniscience. She admits gaps in her understanding: 'I can't tell you how it was, but we always did it'—referring to calling their parents 'papa' and 'mother'—and she withholds information for the sake of proper order, because 'mother says it's an awfully bad habit to do things that way.' This narrative stance creates a double perspective: the reader sees both what the child felt at the time and what the older narrator now perceives, though the older narrator still speaks in the same colloquial register. The effect is a voice that is naive yet reflective, limited yet honest.

The Texture of Everyday Conflict

The excerpt from the toast-burning episode shows how Molesworth builds tension through small, concrete details. The burnt carpet is 'the little round hole where the spark had fallen'; the smell comes from 'the slice of toast that fell into the fire' with butter on it. Uncle Geoff's reaction shifts from sternness to near-smiling when he sees the improvised toasting setup—'bits of string' still hanging on the poker and tongs. But the conflict with Mrs. Partridge is not resolved by this discovery. She counters with a broader accusation of 'rudeness' and 'disobedience,' and the narrator, looking back, acknowledges that Mrs. Partridge 'did believe what she said.' The scene avoids a simple villain-victim dynamic, instead showing how misunderstandings accumulate from both sides.

Dialogue as a Window into Character

Molesworth uses dialogue to reveal character without explicit commentary. Uncle Geoff's speech is measured and formal: 'I am very sorry that all of you—you Audrey, especially, who are old enough to know better—should be so troublesome and disobedient.' Mrs. Partridge's language is more defensive and self-justifying: 'it's natural for me to have felt upset' and 'it's a thing at my age, sir, I can't stand.' Audrey's internal response—'I got hard again and said nothing'—shows a child steeling herself against perceived injustice. The contrast between what characters say and what the narrator thinks creates a layered picture of family dynamics, where adults are not always right and children are not always wrong, but both are trapped in their own perspectives.

Setting as Emotional Barometer

The London setting is not merely a backdrop but a source of tension. The children are uprooted from their home and placed in 'the quiet orderly house' of their uncle, a house that Mrs. Partridge has 'got to think almost her own.' The physical space reflects the emotional dislocation: the children are out of place, and their attempts to make themselves at home—toasting bread, exploring—are read as transgressions. The air-garden mentioned in the chapter list hints at a more imaginative space, but the excerpts show the children confined indoors, under the watch of a housekeeper who sees them as intruders. The setting thus reinforces the story's central conflict between the children's need for freedom and the adult world's demand for order.

Readers who enjoy first-person narratives with a strong, idiosyncratic voice will find Audrey's account both amusing and touching. The story rewards attention to small details—the way a child describes a burnt carpet, the precise wording of an adult's reproach—because these details carry the emotional weight. Because the excerpts cover only the early chapters, the later development of the uncle's character and the resolution of the children's situation remain to be discovered. The book invites readers to compare their own judgments of the characters with Audrey's evolving understanding.

Reading The Boys and I, I kept thinking of that quiet understanding children have of animals, the way Audrey narrates her siblings’ mishaps with such gentle seriousness. It reminded me of the careful, tender observation in Minnie's Pet Horse — Context and Discussion. Both feel less like stories and more like remembered afternoons, where the world was small but whole.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How will you remember this book?

Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

How much did you enjoy the reading experience?

3

Would you encourage someone else to read it?

4

How much effort did this book require?

Related eBooks